Sharp Claw I vs Miloš vs Uran-9

Measure	No public photo yetWe only show photos we're allowed to useSharp Claw I	Miloš	Uran-9
Maker	NORINCO (China North Industries)	Military Technical Institute (designer); PPT Namenska (maker)	JSC 766 UPTK (later Kalashnikov Concern)
Country	China	Serbia	Russia
Status	In service	In service	In service
First shown	2014-11	2017	2016-09
Released	2020-04	—	2019-01
Price	—	—	—
Height	60 cm	—	250 cm
Weight	120 kg	430 kg	10000 kg
Top speed	9 km/h	12.5 km/h	35 km/h best
Payload	—	—	—
Battery	2 h	—	—
Joints (DoF)	—	—	—
Moves on	Tracks	Tracks	Tracks
Hands	none	none	none
Built for	reconnaissance, fire support	reconnaissance, fire support	armed reconnaissance, fire support
Units built or sold	A December 2021 press report cited by Army Recognition said 88 were sent to Tibet	In serial production; 15+ built	—

Figures are what makers or the press published; “—” means not published. Each robot's profile links to its sources.

Popular comparisons

Well-known robots paired only when they move the same way, are at the same stage and share a main job. How we choose

• FX Aegis vs Go2
• Go2 vs CyberDog 2
• FX Aegis vs Vision 60
• ANYmal D vs Vision 60
• FX Aegis vs CyberDog 2
• Kurier (Kuryer) ground robotic complex vs TerMIT (Termit)
• ROOK vs HR-Sherpa (Multi-Purpose UGV)

How comparisons are chosen

Every robot page, the suggestions above and the popular list follow the same rules, so a comparison is never a random pick. You can still compare any two robots yourself with the menus at the top.

1. Like with like. Humanoids are compared with humanoids, and a machine only with its own type: a robot dog with robot dogs.
2. Another maker. A maker’s own models are listed on its page instead.
3. Moves the same way. Walking robots with walking robots, wheeled with wheeled, fixed upper bodies with fixed upper bodies.
4. Same stage. Robots on sale or in pilots with each other; prototypes with prototypes; research platforms with research platforms; past robots with robots of their time.
5. A shared main job. At least one job in common, such as factory work, retail or care. Broad labels like research, education or general-purpose only count when a robot has nothing more specific.
6. Close in time, size and price. First shown within two years, in the same size class (full size from 150 cm, mid size 100 to 149 cm, small under 100 cm) and priced within three times of each other when both prices are published. If fewer than two robots pass, these three are relaxed and the page says the matches are the nearest ones.

Under each peer’s name, the page lists which of these it shares. Closer size and price, and more jobs in common, put a robot higher in the list.